You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endangered species recovery: A resource allocation problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aat8434 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah R Gerber, Michael C Runge, Richard F Maloney, Gwenllian D Iacona, C Ashton Drew, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, James Brazill-Boast, Deborah Crouse, Rebecca S Epanchin-Niell, Sarah B Hall, Lynn A Maguire, Tim Male, Don Morgan, Jeff Newman, Hugh P Possingham, Libby Rumpff, Katherine C B Weiss, Robyn S Wilson, Marilet A Zablan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 25% |
| Canada | 8 | 14% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 64% |
| Scientists | 19 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 880. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#19,551
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Science
#945
of 80,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363
of 356,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#30
of 1,222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.