↓ Skip to main content

Probing pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson dark matter at loop level

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Probing pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson dark matter at loop level
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep12(2018)089
Authors

Koji Ishiwata, Takashi Toma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,000,975
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#5,388
of 24,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,879
of 447,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#156
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.