↓ Skip to main content

New Standard Model constraints on the scales and dimension of spacetime

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
New Standard Model constraints on the scales and dimension of spacetime
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep12(2018)130
Authors

Andrea Addazi, Gianluca Calcagni, Antonino Marcianò

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,603,323
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#3,692
of 24,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,389
of 446,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#88
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.