↓ Skip to main content

Reducing the risk of fetal distress with sildenafil study (RIDSTRESS): a double-blind randomised control trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing the risk of fetal distress with sildenafil study (RIDSTRESS): a double-blind randomised control trial
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-0769-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam Dunn, Vicki Flenady, Sailesh Kumar

Abstract

Labour is perhaps the most hazardous time in pregnancy. As many as 20 % of cerebral palsy cases in term infants result from intrapartum events and up to 63 % of babies who develop intrapartum compromise have no prior risk factors. Sildenafil citrate (SC), a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, improves uterine blood supply through vasodilatation and potentially could improve placental perfusion and hence reduce the risk of intrapartum fetal hypoxia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SC to reduce the risk of intrapartum fetal compromise and the need for emergency operative delivery. This is a single centre, double-blind, randomised, phase II clinical trial of SC or placebo given during labour to women (18-50 years of age) with a single, appropriately grown, non-anomalous baby at term (37-42 weeks gestation). Those with cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, ocular or hypertensive disease or contraindication to SC will be excluded. Participants will be randomised to either SC 50 mg or placebo capsules eight hourly (SC maximum 150 mg) to commence when admitted to birth suite for management of labour. Within 3 h of the first dose, a repeat ultrasound scan will be performed to measure any changes in uteroplacental and fetal Doppler indices. Labour will continue otherwise in accordance with hospital clinical guidelines. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise. Secondary outcomes include the effect of SC on fetal and uteroplacental blood flow, meconium liquor, fetal heart rate abnormalities and neonatal outcomes (admission to neonatal intensive care, Apgar <7 at 5 min, cord pH <7.1 or lactate >4.0 mmol/L, neonatal encephalopathy, death). This is the first reported study evaluating the efficacy of SC on reducing the risk intrapartum fetal compromise. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12615000319572.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2020.
All research outputs
#773,561
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#144
of 3,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,154
of 395,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.