↓ Skip to main content

Test-Driven Development in scientific software: a survey

Overview of attention for article published in Software Quality Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Test-Driven Development in scientific software: a survey
Published in
Software Quality Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11219-015-9292-4
Authors

Aziz Nanthaamornphong, Jeffrey C. Carver

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 26%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 55%
Engineering 8 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,436,183
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Software Quality Journal
#109
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,372
of 274,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software Quality Journal
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.