| Title |
Trofosfamide in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00432-018-2772-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanno M. Witte, Armin Riecke, Thomas Mayer, Tobias Bartscht, Dirk Rades, Hendrik Lehnert, Hartmut Merz, Sebastian Fetscher, Harald Biersack, Niklas Gebauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,764,072
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#498
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,450
of 350,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.