| Title |
Does a Positive Neer Impingement Sign Reflect Rotator Cuff Contact with the Acromion?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-010-1590-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaofeng Jia, Jong Hun Ji, Vinodhkumar Pannirselvam, Steve A. Petersen, Edward G. McFarland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,572,953
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#406
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,901
of 107,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.