↓ Skip to main content

日本の大学生は情報源がWikipedia日本語版である情報の信憑性を他のオンライン百科事典である情報よりも低く判断する

Overview of attention for article published in Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本の大学生は情報源がWikipedia日本語版である情報の信憑性を他のオンライン百科事典である情報よりも低く判断する
Published in
Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi, September 2018
DOI 10.2964/jsik_2018_023
Authors

佐藤 翔, 楠本 千紘, 服部 亮, 大菅 真季, 浅井 理沙, 河野 真央, 久山 寮納

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#913,557
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#2
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,401
of 354,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them