↓ Skip to main content

Lay perceptions of risk factors for Rift Valley fever in a pastoral community in northeastern Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Lay perceptions of risk factors for Rift Valley fever in a pastoral community in northeastern Kenya
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2707-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline M. Ng’ang’a, Salome A. Bukachi, Bernard K. Bett

Abstract

Human behavioral factors have been found to be central in the transmission of Rift Valley fever. Consumption of contaminated meat and milk in particular have been identified as one of the key risk factors for the transmission of Rift Valley fever in humans. In pastoral communities, livestock is the main source of livelihood from which many benefits such as food as well as economic and cultural services are derived. Zoonotic diseases therefore have a great impact on pastoral communities livelihoods. However, lay perceptions regarding the transmission of these diseases including Rift Valley fever hampers their effective control. This study investigated the lay perceptions of risks for Rift Valley fever transmission in a pastoral community in northeastern Kenya. A qualitative study was carried out in Ijara district, Kenya which was one of the hotspots of Rift Valley during the 2006/2007 outbreak. Data were collected using focus group discussions and narratives guided by checklists. Eight focus group discussions consisting of 83 participants and six narratives were conducted. Data was transcribed, coded and analysed according to Emergent themes. The participants reported that they had experienced Rift Valley fever in their livestock especially sheep and in humans both in 1997/1998 and 2006/2007. However, they believed that infections in humans occurred as a result of mosquito bites and had little to do with their consumption of meat, milk and blood from infected livestock. The participants in this study indicated that they had heard of the risks of acquiring the disease through consumption of livestock products but their experiences did not tally with the information they had received hence to them, Rift Valley fever was not transmissible through their dietary practices. Though the communities in this region were aware of Rift Valley fever, they did not have elaborate information regarding the disease transmission dynamics to humans. To avoid misconception about transmission of the disease, intervention strategies, require to be accompanied by comprehensive explanations of the dynamics of its transmission. It is necessary to develop appropriate interventions that take into consideration, lay perceptions of risk factors for the disease and communities' livelihood strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 22%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,337,328
of 24,044,816 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,647
of 15,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,048
of 403,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,044,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.