| Title |
Turnaround Time (TAT): Difference in Concept for Laboratory and Clinician
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12288-012-0214-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hara P. Pati, Gurmeet Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#61
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,109
of 186,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.