You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Storage and Processing in Working Memory: Assessing Dual-Task Performance and Task Prioritization Across the Adult Lifespan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1037/xge0000539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Rhodes, Agnieszka J. Jaroslawska, Jason M. Doherty, Clément Belletier, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Nelson Cowan, Valérie Camos, Pierre Barrouillet, Robert H. Logie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 13% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#1,215
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,459
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.