↓ Skip to main content

Development and internal validation of prediction models for biochemical failure and composite failure after focal salvage high intensity focused ultrasound for local radiorecurrent prostate cancer…

Overview of attention for article published in Urologic Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and internal validation of prediction models for biochemical failure and composite failure after focal salvage high intensity focused ultrasound for local radiorecurrent prostate cancer: Presentation of risk scores for individual patient prognoses
Published in
Urologic Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Peters, Abi Kanthabalan, Taimur T. Shah, Neil McCartan, Caroline M. Moore, Manit Arya, Jochem R. van der Voort van Zyp, Marinus A. Moerland, Richard G. Hindley, Mark Emberton, Hashim U. Ahmed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Other 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 45%
Unspecified 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,764,998
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Urologic Oncology
#1,346
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,874
of 325,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urologic Oncology
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.