| Title |
The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastric Cancer, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10120-015-0587-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emil ter Veer, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Paul Lodder, Lok Lam Ngai, Mary Samaan, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,471,048
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#145
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,216
of 394,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.