↓ Skip to main content

How to Replicate the Functions and Biodiversity of a Threatened Tree Species? The Case of Fraxinus excelsior in Britain

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
How to Replicate the Functions and Biodiversity of a Threatened Tree Species? The Case of Fraxinus excelsior in Britain
Published in
Ecosystems, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9953-y
Authors

Ruth J. Mitchell, Robin J. Pakeman, Alice Broome, Joan K. Beaton, Paul E. Bellamy, Rob W. Brooker, Chris J. Ellis, Alison J. Hester, Nick G. Hodgetts, Glenn R. Iason, Nick A. Littlewood, Gabor Pozsgai, Scot Ramsay, David Riach, Jenni A. Stockan, Andy F. S. Taylor, Steve Woodward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Lecturer 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 37%
Environmental Science 23 35%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,188,012
of 24,479,790 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#441
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,911
of 405,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,479,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.