You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional recovery after dantrolene-supplementation of cold stored hearts using an ex vivo isolated working rat heart model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0205850 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanette E. Villanueva, Ling Gao, Hong C. Chew, Mark Hicks, Aoife Doyle, Min Ru Qui, Kumud K. Dhital, Peter S. Macdonald, Andrew Jabbour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#133,236
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,432
of 346,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,167
of 3,264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.