| Title |
Study design and characteristics of the Luxembourg European Health Examination Survey (EHES-LUX)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6087-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valéry Bocquet, Jessica Barré, Sophie Couffignal, Marylène d’Incau, Charles Delagardelle, Georges Michel, Marc Schlesser, Saverio Stranges, Andrea Kuemmerle, Maria Ruiz-Castell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,692,105
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,628
of 15,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,926
of 346,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#112
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.