↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model: a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 285)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model: a Systematic Review
Published in
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40489-015-0068-3
Authors

Hannah Waddington, Larah van der Meer, Jeff Sigafoos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 36%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,756,573
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#48
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,939
of 401,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them