↓ Skip to main content

Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katsuyuki Sakai, Katsuya Kitaguchi, Okihide Hikosaka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 2%
Japan 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 271 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 31%
Researcher 59 20%
Student > Master 35 12%
Professor 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 27%
Neuroscience 50 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Computer Science 20 7%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 47 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#969
of 3,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,467
of 52,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.