You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Psychiatry, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17040415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Mackey, Nicholas Allgaier, Bader Chaarani, Philip Spechler, Catherine Orr, Janice Bunn, Nicholas B. Allen, Nelly Alia-Klein, Albert Batalla, Sara Blaine, Samantha Brooks, Elisabeth Caparelli, Yann Ying Chye, Janna Cousijn, Alain Dagher, Sylvane Desrivieres, Sarah Feldstein-Ewing, John J. Foxe, Rita Z. Goldstein, Anna E. Goudriaan, Mary M. Heitzeg, Robert Hester, Kent Hutchison, Ozlem Korucuoglu, Chiang-Shan R. Li, Edythe London, Valentina Lorenzetti, Maartje Luijten, Rocio Martin-Santos, April May, Reza Momenan, Angelica Morales, Martin P. Paulus, Godfrey Pearlson, Marc-Etienne Rousseau, Betty Jo Salmeron, Renée Schluter, Lianne Schmaal, Gunter Schumann, Zsuzsika Sjoerds, Dan J. Stein, Elliot A. Stein, Rajita Sinha, Nadia Solowij, Susan Tapert, Anne Uhlmann, Dick Veltman, Ruth van Holst, Sarah Whittle, Reinout Wiers, Margaret J. Wright, Murat Yücel, Sheng Zhang, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Derrek P. Hibar, Neda Jahanshad, Alan Evans, Paul M. Thompson, David C. Glahn, Patricia Conrod, Hugh Garavan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
| Scientists | 13 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 261 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 37 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 103 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,166,754
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#884
of 7,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,895
of 361,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.