| Title |
Cerebral oxygenation declines but does not impair peak oxygen uptake during incremental cycling in women using oral contraceptives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-018-3968-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karlee M. Quinn, François Billaut, Andrew C. Bulmer, Clare L. Minahan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4,068
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,908
of 342,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#53
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.