↓ Skip to main content

Understanding island residents’ anxiety about impacts caused by climate change using Best–Worst Scaling: a case study of Amami islands, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Understanding island residents’ anxiety about impacts caused by climate change using Best–Worst Scaling: a case study of Amami islands, Japan
Published in
Sustainability Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0640-8
Authors

Takahiro Kubo, Takahiro Tsuge, Hiroya Abe, Hiroya Yamano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 32%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 12%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,128,452
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#216
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,542
of 349,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.