↓ Skip to main content

Human progress by human effort: neo-Darwinism, social heredity, and the professionalization of the American social sciences, 1889–1925

Overview of attention for article published in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Human progress by human effort: neo-Darwinism, social heredity, and the professionalization of the American social sciences, 1889–1925
Published in
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40656-018-0225-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie J. Raymer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,831,119
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#399
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,622
of 352,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.