You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Global Health Experiences in the Development of New Cardiologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marwah Abdalla, Neal Kovach, Connie Liu, Julie B. Damp, Eiman Jahangir, Anthony Hilliard, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Mazen S. Abu-Fadel, Mikhael F. El Chami, Sameer Gafoor, Rajesh Vedanthan, Monica Sanchez-Shields, Jon C. George, Tiffany Priester, Mirvat Alasnag, Colin Barker, Andrew M. Freeman |
| Abstract |
As the global burden of cardiovascular disease continues to increase worldwide, nurturing the development of early-career cardiologists interested in global health is essential to create a cadre of providers with the skill set to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases in international settings. As such, interest in global health has increased among cardiology trainees and early-career cardiologists over the past decade. International clinical and research experiences abroad present an additional opportunity for growth and development beyond traditional cardiovascular training. We describe the American College of Cardiology International Cardiovascular Exchange Database, a new resource for cardiologists interested in pursuing short-term clinical exchange opportunities abroad, and report some of the benefits and challenges of global health cardiovascular training in both resource-limited and resource-abundant settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,084,753
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,432
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,784
of 399,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#71
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.