↓ Skip to main content

病院前診療での四肢重症外傷に対するCombat Application Tourniquet® (CAT®) の効果

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
病院前診療での四肢重症外傷に対するCombat Application Tourniquet® (CAT®) の効果
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma, October 2016
DOI 10.11382/jjast.30.444
Authors

岡野 雄一, 寺住 恵子, 堀 耕太, 加藤 陽一, 大塚 尚実, 山家 純一, 桑原 謙, 奥本 克己, 井 清司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma
#5
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,479
of 332,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them