| Title |
Who walks through the revolving door? Examining the lobbying activity of former members of Congress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Interest Groups & Advocacy, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1057/iga.2015.16 |
| Authors |
Jeffrey Lazarus, Amy McKay, Lindsey Herbel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 38% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 44% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#473,560
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#2
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,241
of 403,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them