Title |
Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI.nz) study: a randomised controlled trial of sleep, food and activity interventions for preventing overweight from birth
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-942 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barry J Taylor, Anne-Louise M Heath, Barbara C Galland, Andrew R Gray, Julie A Lawrence, Rachel M Sayers, Kelly Dale, Kirsten J Coppell, Rachael W Taylor |
Abstract |
Rapid weight gain during the first three years of life predicts child and adult obesity, and also later cardiovascular and other morbidities. Cross-sectional studies suggest that infant diet, activity and sleep are linked to excessive weight gain. As intervention for overweight children is difficult, the aim of the Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI.nz) study is to evaluate two primary prevention strategies during late pregnancy and early childhood that could be delivered separately or together as part of normal health care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 525 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 109 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 13% |
Researcher | 53 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 4% |
Other | 84 | 16% |
Unknown | 141 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 17% |
Psychology | 57 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 37 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 24 | 5% |
Other | 51 | 10% |
Unknown | 161 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,003,885
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,168
of 15,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,969
of 244,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#56
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.