↓ Skip to main content

Back to the Future of Soil Metagenomics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back to the Future of Soil Metagenomics
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Nesme, Wafa Achouak, Spiros N. Agathos, Mark Bailey, Petr Baldrian, Dominique Brunel, Åsa Frostegård, Thierry Heulin, Janet K. Jansson, Edouard Jurkevitch, Kristiina L. Kruus, George A. Kowalchuk, Antonio Lagares, Hilary M. Lappin-Scott, Philippe Lemanceau, Denis Le Paslier, Ines Mandic-Mulec, J. Colin Murrell, David D. Myrold, Renaud Nalin, Paolo Nannipieri, Josh D. Neufeld, Fergal O'Gara, John J. Parnell, Alfred Pühler, Victor Pylro, Juan L. Ramos, Luiz F. W. Roesch, Michael Schloter, Christa Schleper, Alexander Sczyrba, Angela Sessitsch, Sara Sjöling, Jan Sørensen, Søren J. Sørensen, Christoph C. Tebbe, Edward Topp, George Tsiamis, Jan Dirk van Elsas, Geertje van Keulen, Franco Widmer, Michael Wagner, Tong Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Liping Zhao, Yong-Guan Zhu, Timothy M. Vogel, Pascal Simonet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 539 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 21%
Researcher 112 20%
Student > Bachelor 65 12%
Student > Master 59 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 6%
Other 88 16%
Unknown 84 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 234 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 83 15%
Environmental Science 72 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 115 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,551,063
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#948
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,649
of 410,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#27
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.