| Title |
Cyfip1 is downregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and may be a potential biomarker in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-016-4786-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xu Chen, Lingyan Qin, Ping Li, Wuning Mo |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of Cyfip1 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and its correlations with clinical pathologic features. A total of 86 ALL samples and 32 normal peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) samples were enrolled in our study. mRNA expression of the Cyfip1 was assessed by real-time fluorescent relatively quantitative PCR, and Cyfip1 protein expression was evaluated by Western blot analysis. As a result, both mRNA and protein expression levels of Cyfip1 were significantly lower in ALL patients than those in the control samples (P = 0.025 and 0.000, respectively). Moreover, both mRNA and protein expression of both had an inverse relation with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.015 and 0.007, respectively), In conclusion, detecting mRNA and protein expression of Cyfip1 could provide clinically significant information relevant to diagnosis, progression, and treatment modalities for ALL, and Cyfip1 may serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in ALL. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,983,210
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,851
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,641
of 399,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#156
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.