| Title |
Sex-biased natal dispersal in Hokkaido brown bears revealed through mitochondrial DNA analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1222-x |
| Authors |
Yuri Shirane, Michito Shimozuru, Masami Yamanaka, Hifumi Tsuruga, Saiko Hirano, Natsuo Nagano, Jun Moriwaki, Masanao Nakanishi, Tsuyoshi Ishinazaka, Takane Nose, Shinsuke Kasai, Masataka Shirayanagi, Yasushi Masuda, Yasushi Fujimoto, Masahiro Osada, Masao Akaishi, Tsutomu Mano, Ryuichi Masuda, Mariko Sashika, Toshio Tsubota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,427,892
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#547
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,099
of 349,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.