↓ Skip to main content

SET7/9 inhibits oncogenic activities through regulation of Gli-1 expression in breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
SET7/9 inhibits oncogenic activities through regulation of Gli-1 expression in breast cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-016-4822-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongchun Song, Jianli Zhang, Tao Tian, Xiao Fu, Wenjuan Wang, Suoni Li, Tingting Shi, Aili Suo, Zhiping Ruan, Hui Guo, Yu Yao

Abstract

SET7/9 is a protein lysine methyltransferase that had been initially identified as a histone lysine methyltransferase which generates monomethylation at histone 3 lysine 4. Different functions were attributed to the protein methylation mediated by SET7/9. In this study, we found that the expression of SET7/9 declined in a majority of the human breast cancer tissues examined compared with normal tissues. Knockdown of SET7/9 promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells. Knockdown of SET7/9 also increased the tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells in vivo. On the contrary, overexpression of SET7/9 in breast cancer cells inhibited these processes. Microarray analysis indicated that Gli-1 may play function as a downstream factor of SET7/9. Overexpression of SET7/9SET7/9 inhibits Gli-1 expression. While knockdown of SET7/9 promotes the expression of Gli-1. Gli-1 inhibited by cyclopamine blocked knockdown SET7/9-driven proliferation, migration, and invasion in breast cancer cell. Furthermore, Gli-1 expression in human breast cancer tissues is negatively correlated with SET7/9 expression. Together, these results helped to realize the antioncogene functions of SET7/9 in breast cancer cells and provided a novel direction to treat breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 28%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,983,210
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,851
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,974
of 395,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#155
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.