| Title |
Failed Fantasies in a South African Context: the Case of Modderfontein, Johannesburg
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Urban Forum, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12132-018-9348-1 |
| Authors |
Frances Brill, Ricardo Reboredo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Czechia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#673,321
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Urban Forum
#7
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,285
of 349,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Forum
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them