↓ Skip to main content

Tobacco nitrosamines as culprits in disease: mechanisms reviewed

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Tobacco nitrosamines as culprits in disease: mechanisms reviewed
Published in
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13105-016-0465-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emine Yalcin, Suzanne de la Monte

Abstract

The link between tobacco abuse and cancer is well-established. However, emerging data indicate that toxins in tobacco smoke cause cellular injury due to enhanced toxic/metabolic effects of metabolites, disruption of intracellular signaling mechanisms, and formation of DNA, protein, and lipid adducts that impair function and promote oxidative stress and inflammation. These effects of smoking, which are largely non-carcinogenic, can be produced by tobacco-specific nitrosamines and their metabolites. These factors could account for the increased rates of neurodegeneration and insulin resistance diseases among smokers. Herein, we review nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamine metabolism, mechanisms of adduct formation, DNA damage, mutagenesis, and potential mechanisms of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 41 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 43 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,428,662
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#100
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,894
of 395,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.