| Title |
Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, November 1983
|
| DOI | 10.3758/bf03198284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Becklen, Daniel Cervone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 51% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,938,416
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#200
of 1,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314
of 8,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.