↓ Skip to main content

Life histories of the copepods Pseudocalanus minutus, P. acuspes (Calanoida) and Oithona similis (Cyclopoida) in the Arctic Kongsfjorden (Svalbard)

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Life histories of the copepods Pseudocalanus minutus, P. acuspes (Calanoida) and Oithona similis (Cyclopoida) in the Arctic Kongsfjorden (Svalbard)
Published in
Polar Biology, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00300-005-0017-1
Authors

Silke Lischka, Wilhelm Hagen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 26%
Researcher 24 26%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 48%
Environmental Science 21 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,307
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#606
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,568
of 57,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.