| Title |
The decline of native coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States and Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-006-9021-1 |
| Authors |
Jason P. Harmon, Erin Stephens, John Losey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,471,048
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#266
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,237
of 69,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.