↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the Cholinergic Hypothesis in Alzheimer’s Disease: Emerging Evidence from Translational and Clinical Research

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting the Cholinergic Hypothesis in Alzheimer’s Disease: Emerging Evidence from Translational and Clinical Research
Published in
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, October 2018
DOI 10.14283/jpad.2018.43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Hampel, M.-M. Mesulam, A. C. Cuello, A. S. Khachaturian, A. Vergallo, M. R. Farlow, P. J. Snyder, E. Giacobini, Z. S. Khachaturian

Abstract

Scientific evidence collected over the past 4 decades suggests that a loss of cholinergic innervation in the cerebral cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease is an early pathogenic event correlated with cognitive impairment. This evidence led to the formulation of the "Cholinergic Hypothesis of AD" and the development of cholinesterase inhibitor therapies. Although approved only as symptomatic therapies, recent studies suggest that long-term use of these drugs may also have disease-modifying benefits. A Cholinergic System Workgroup reassessed the role of the cholinergic system on AD pathogenesis in light of recent data, including neuroimaging data charting the progression of neurodegeneration in the cholinergic system and suggesting that cholinergic therapy may slow brain atrophy. Other pathways that contribute to cholinergic synaptic loss and their effect on cognitive impairment in AD were also reviewed. These studies indicate that the cholinergic system as one of several interacting systems failures that contribute to AD pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 304 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Student > Master 33 11%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 125 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 38 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Chemistry 13 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 149 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,865,336
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
#229
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,440
of 360,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.