You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Medium Chain Fatty Acid Supplementation Leads to Reduced VLDL Lipolysis and Uptake Rates in Comparison to Linoleic Acid Supplementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0100376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniël B. van Schalkwijk, Wilrike J. Pasman, Henk F. J. Hendriks, Elwin R. Verheij, Carina M. Rubingh, Kees van Bochove, Wouter H. J. Vaes, Martin Adiels, Andreas P. Freidig, Albert A. de Graaf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,196,553
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#141,411
of 205,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,649
of 231,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,897
of 4,790 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,790 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.