↓ Skip to main content

Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
665 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, September 2012
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2012-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoît Famaey, Stacy S. McGaugh

Abstract

A wealth of astronomical data indicate the presence of mass discrepancies in the Universe. The motions observed in a variety of classes of extragalactic systems exceed what can be explained by the mass visible in stars and gas. Either (i) there is a vast amount of unseen mass in some novel form - dark matter - or (ii) the data indicate a breakdown of our understanding of dynamics on the relevant scales, or (iii) both. Here, we first review a few outstanding challenges for the dark matter interpretation of mass discrepancies in galaxies, purely based on observations and independently of any alternative theoretical framework. We then show that many of these puzzling observations are predicted by one single relation - Milgrom's law - involving an acceleration constant a0 (or a characteristic surface density Σ† = a0/G) on the order of the square-root of the cosmological constant in natural units. This relation can at present most easily be interpreted as the effect of a single universal force law resulting from a modification of Newtonian dynamics (MOND) on galactic scales. We exhaustively review the current observational successes and problems of this alternative paradigm at all astrophysical scales, and summarize the various theoretical attempts (TeVeS, GEA, BIMOND, and others) made to effectively embed this modification of Newtonian dynamics within a relativistic theory of gravity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 39 22%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 119 68%
Philosophy 6 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#845,564
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#13
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,587
of 187,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.