↓ Skip to main content

Expertengremium empfiehlt Senföle zur kausal orientierten Therapie

Overview of attention for article published in MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 568)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
Title
Expertengremium empfiehlt Senföle zur kausal orientierten Therapie
Published in
MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s15006-016-7954-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Red

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,847,457
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin
#33
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,388
of 300,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.