↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of methodologies for enumerating and detecting the viability of Ascaris eggs in sewage sludge by standard incubation-microscopy, the BacLight Live/Dead viability assay and other vital dyes

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of methodologies for enumerating and detecting the viability of Ascaris eggs in sewage sludge by standard incubation-microscopy, the BacLight Live/Dead viability assay and other vital dyes
Published in
Water Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alaa Karkashan, Basma Khallaf, Jacqueline Morris, Nerida Thurbon, Duncan Rouch, Stephen R. Smith, Margaret Deighton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Environmental Science 9 17%
Engineering 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#9,085
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,541
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#88
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.