You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making healthy eating and physical activity policy practice: The design and overview of a group randomized controlled trial in afterschool programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contemporary Clinical Trials, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W. Beets, R. Glenn Weaver, Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Jennifer Huberty, Dianne S. Ward, Darcy A. Freedman, Ruth Saunders, Russell R. Pate, Aaron Beighle, Brent Hutto, Justin B. Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 13% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#1,247
of 1,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,999
of 241,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.