↓ Skip to main content

The Instrumental Revolution in Chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Chemistry, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 153)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The Instrumental Revolution in Chemistry
Published in
Foundations of Chemistry, May 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023691917565
Authors

habil. Klaus Hentschel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Chemistry 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Chemistry
#44
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,826
of 54,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Chemistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.