↓ Skip to main content

Who Will Win: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Versus Embryonic Stem Cells for β Cell Replacement and Diabetes Disease Modeling?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Who Will Win: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Versus Embryonic Stem Cells for β Cell Replacement and Diabetes Disease Modeling?
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11892-018-1109-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena F. Jacobson, Emmanuel S. Tzanakakis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,652,743
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#783
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,605
of 349,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.