↓ Skip to main content

Individual-level changes in self-rated health before and during the economic crisis in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Individual-level changes in self-rated health before and during the economic crisis in Europe
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0290-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawit Shawel Abebe, Anne Grete Tøge, Espen Dahl

Abstract

Changes over time in self-rated health (SRH) are increasingly documented during the current economic crisis, though whether these are due to selection, causation, or methodological artefacts is unclear. This study accordingly investigates changes in SRH, and social inequalities in these changes, before and during the economic crisis in 23 European countries. We used balanced panel data, 2005-2011, from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). We included the working-age population (25-60 years old) living in 23 European countries. The data cover 65,618 respondents, 2005-2007 (pre-recession cohort), and 43,188 respondents, 2008-2011 (recession cohort). The data analyses used mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models considering the degree of recession (i.e., pre, mild, and severe). Individual-level changes in SRH over time indicted a stable trend during the pre-recession period, while a significant increasing trend in fair and poor SRH was found in the mild- and severe-recession cohorts. Micro-level demographic and socio-economic status (SES) factors (i.e., age, gender, education, and transitions to employment/unemployment), and macro-level factors such as welfare generosity are significantly associated with SRH trends across the degrees of recession. The current economic crisis accounts for an increasing trend in fair and poor SRH among the general working-age population of Europe. Despite the general SES inequalities in SRH, the health of vulnerable groups has been affected the same way before and during the current recession.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,354,849
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,537
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,564
of 393,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#33
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.