↓ Skip to main content

An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
29 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
705 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
583 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota
Published in
Gut, December 2011
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian B Jeffery, Paul W O'Toole, Lena Öhman, Marcus J Claesson, Jennifer Deane, Eamonn M M Quigley, Magnus Simrén

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder that may be triggered by enteric pathogens and has also been linked to alterations in the microbiota and the host immune response. The authors performed a detailed analysis of the faecal microbiota in IBS and control subjects and correlated the findings with key clinical and physiological parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 583 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 571 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 114 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 14%
Student > Bachelor 69 12%
Student > Master 66 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 6%
Other 87 15%
Unknown 130 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 3%
Other 63 11%
Unknown 144 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#938,694
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#565
of 7,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,280
of 249,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#4
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.