↓ Skip to main content

Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: International Rock Climbing Research Association position statement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Technology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: International Rock Climbing Research Association position statement
Published in
Journal of Sports Technology, January 2016
DOI 10.1080/19346182.2015.1107081
Authors

Nick Draper, David Giles, Volker Schöffl, Franz Konstantin Fuss, Phillip Watts, Peter Wolf, Jiří Baláš, Vanesa Espana-Romero, Gina Blunt Gonzalez, Simon Fryer, Maurizio Fanchini, Laurent Vigouroux, Ludovic Seifert, Lars Donath, Manuel Spoerri, Kelios Bonetti, Kevin Phillips, Urs Stöcker, Felix Bourassa-Moreau, Inmaculada Garrido, Scott Drum, Stuart Beekmeyer, Jean-Luc Ziltener, Nicola Taylor, Ina Beeretz, Franziska Mally, Arif Mithat Amca, Caroline Linhart, Edgardo Abreu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 67 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Computer Science 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 78 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,761,242
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Technology
#16
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,274
of 400,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Technology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.