You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of methods for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analyst, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c8an01488d |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Rajapaksha, A. Elbourne, S. Gangadoo, R. Brown, D. Cozzolino, J. Chapman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 533 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 13% |
| Unknown | 215 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 10% |
| Engineering | 44 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 27 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 86 | 16% |
| Unknown | 240 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,571,755
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Analyst
#3,704
of 6,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,181
of 447,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analyst
#129
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.