↓ Skip to main content

Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
37 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
445 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
587 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries
Published in
The Lancet, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01020-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Flenady, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Philippa Middleton, David Ellwood, Jan Jaap Erwich, Michael Coory, T Yee Khong, Robert M Silver, Gordon C S Smith, Frances M Boyle, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Susannah Hopkins Leisher, Mechthild M Gross, Dell Horey, Lynn Farrales, Frank Bloomfield, Lesley McCowan, Stephanie J Brown, K S Joseph, Jennifer Zeitlin, Hanna E Reinebrant, Joanne Cacciatore, Claudia Ravaldi, Alfredo Vannacci, Jillian Cassidy, Paul Cassidy, Cindy Farquhar, Euan Wallace, Dimitrios Siassakos, Alexander E P Heazell, Claire Storey, Lynn Sadler, Scott Petersen, J Frederik Frøen, Robert L Goldenberg, Vicki Flenady, J Frederik Frøen, Mary V Kinney, Luc de Bernis, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Alexander Heazell, Susannah Hopkins Leisher, Jessica Ruidiaz, Andre Carvalho, Jane Dahlstrom, Christine East, Jane P Fox, Kristen Gibbons, Ibinabo Ibiebele, Sue Kildea, Glenn Gardener, Rohan Lourie, Patricia Wilson, Adrienne Gordon, Belinda Jennings, Alison Kent, Susan McDonald, Kelly Merchant, Jeremy Oats, Susan P Walker, Leanne Raven, Anne Schirmann, Francine de Montigny, Grace Guyon, Beatrice Blondel, Sabine de Wall, Sheelagh Bonham, Paul Corcoran, Mairie Cregan, Sarah Meany, Margaret Murphy, Stephanie Fukui, Sanne Gordijn, Fleurisca Korteweg, Robin Cronin, Vicki Mason, Vicki Culling, Anna Usynina, Karin Pettersson, Ingela Rådestad, Susanne van Gogh, Bia Bichara, Stephanie Bradley, Alison Ellis, Soo Downe, Elizabeth Draper, Brad Manktelow, Janet Scott, Lucy Smith, William Stones, Tina Lavender, Wes Duke, Ruth C Fretts, Katherine J Gold, Elizabeth McClure, Uma Reddy

Abstract

Variation in stillbirth rates across high-income countries and large equity gaps within high-income countries persist. If all high-income countries achieved stillbirth rates equal to the best performing countries, 19 439 late gestation (28 weeks or more) stillbirths could have been avoided in 2015. The proportion of unexplained stillbirths is high and can be addressed through improvements in data collection, investigation, and classification, and with a better understanding of causal pathways. Substandard care contributes to 20-30% of all stillbirths and the contribution is even higher for late gestation intrapartum stillbirths. National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-income countries. The need to reduce stigma and fatalism related to stillbirth and to improve bereavement care are also clear, persisting priorities for action. In high-income countries, a woman living under adverse socioeconomic circumstances has twice the risk of having a stillborn child when compared to her more advantaged counterparts. Programmes at community and country level need to improve health in disadvantaged families to address these inequities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Myanmar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 575 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 16%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 10%
Other 40 7%
Other 113 19%
Unknown 149 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 209 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 16%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Psychology 17 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 73 12%
Unknown 159 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 327. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#104,045
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,469
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,705
of 405,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#20
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.