↓ Skip to main content

Evoking visual neglect-like deficits in healthy volunteers – an investigation by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Evoking visual neglect-like deficits in healthy volunteers – an investigation by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9506-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Giglhuber, Stefanie Maurer, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, Sandro M. Krieg

Abstract

In clinical practice, repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is of particular interest for non-invasive mapping of cortical language areas. Yet, rTMS studies try to detect further cortical functions. Damage to the underlying network of visuospatial attention function can result in visual neglect-a severe neurological deficit and influencing factor for a significantly reduced functional outcome. This investigation aims to evaluate the use of rTMS for evoking visual neglect in healthy volunteers and the potential of specifically locating cortical areas that can be assigned for the function of visuospatial attention. Ten healthy, right-handed subjects underwent rTMS visual neglect mapping. Repetitive trains of 5 Hz and 10 pulses were applied to 52 pre-defined cortical spots on each hemisphere; each cortical spot was stimulated 10 times. Visuospatial attention was tested time-locked to rTMS pulses by a landmark task. Task pictures were displayed tachistoscopically for 50 ms. The subjects' performance was analyzed by video, and errors were referenced to cortical spots. We observed visual neglect-like deficits during the stimulation of both hemispheres. Errors were categorized into leftward, rightward, and no response errors. Rightward errors occurred significantly more often during stimulation of the right hemisphere than during stimulation of the left hemisphere (mean rightward error rate (ER) 1.6 ± 1.3 % vs. 1.0 ± 1.0 %, p = 0.0141). Within the left hemisphere, we observed predominantly leftward errors rather than rightward errors (mean leftward ER 2.0 ± 1.3 % vs. rightward ER 1.0 ± 1.0 %; p = 0.0005). Visual neglect can be elicited non-invasively by rTMS, and cortical areas eloquent for visuospatial attention can be detected. Yet, the correlation of this approach with clinical findings has to be shown in upcoming steps.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 16%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 41%