| Title |
The illusory leader: natural resources, taxation and accountability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Choice, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11127-011-9820-0 |
| Authors |
Eoin F. McGuirk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 43 | 46% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,865,132
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#286
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,180
of 131,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.